7 Best Loom Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams (2026)

TL;DR — Quick Answer

The best Loom alternative for B2B sales teams in 2026 is Sendspark — it adds AI-powered personalization that Loom lacks entirely. Vidyard is the runner-up for teams needing video hosting alongside outreach. Veed.io wins for content creators who need editing tools. Loom excels at async internal communication but falls short for outbound sales at scale — the tools below fill that gap.

How We Evaluated These Loom Alternatives

We evaluated each tool across five criteria: sales workflow fit (does it support outbound prospecting and CRM integration?), AI personalization capabilities, pricing for small-to-mid sales teams, G2 ratings from verified users, and ease of adoption. Our focus is B2B sales teams of 5–25 reps — if you're looking for a pure async communication tool, Loom may still be your answer. If you're sending video to prospects, read on.

Quick Comparison: 7 Best Loom Alternatives (2026)

1. Sendspark — Best for AI-Personalized Sales Video Outreach

Sendspark is the best Loom alternative for B2B sales teams that send video to prospects. While Loom records and shares videos for async communication, Sendspark takes a fundamentally different approach: record once, personalize for every prospect automatically. AI inserts each recipient's name, company, and website into your video — at scale, without re-recording.

This matters because Loom has no personalization layer at all. A video sent to 100 prospects looks identical for each one. Sendspark's AI personalizes the intro greeting using voice cloning and swaps in each prospect's website as a dynamic background — giving every recipient the impression of a custom-recorded message.

Key features:

• AI Voice Cloning — Clone your voice to auto-generate personalized greetings per prospect
• Dynamic Video Backgrounds — Show each prospect's website or LinkedIn profile behind you in the video
• Combined Videos — Merge a personalized intro with a reusable product demo
• Deep CRM Integration — HubSpot (5/5 rated), Salesforce bi-directional sync
• Sales Sequence Automation — Trigger video sends from Outreach, SalesLoft, and Apollo

Pricing: Solo $49/mo (1 seat), Growth $99/mo (3 seats + API), Team $299/mo (10 seats). Full pricing details →

G2 rating: 4.8/5 from 350+ verified reviews — higher than Loom's 4.7/5.

Best for: B2B sales teams (SDRs, BDRs, AEs) that send outbound video prospecting at scale and need their video data to flow back into HubSpot or Salesforce.

→ Read the full Sendspark vs Loom comparison | Compare all alternatives →

2. Vidyard — Best for Video Hosting + Sales Outreach Combined

Vidyard is the closest direct Loom alternative for sales teams, offering screen recording, video hosting, and AI-powered sales features in one platform. It has a generous free tier (25 videos) and paid plans starting at $29/mo. With 800+ G2 reviews at 4.5/5, it's a proven option for teams transitioning off Loom.

Where Vidyard goes further than Loom: video analytics per-recipient (see who watched, when, and for how long), a sales content hub for storing and sharing demo libraries, and recently-added AI avatar features for async content. Where it falls short of Sendspark: no AI personalization at scale, no dynamic prospect backgrounds, and weaker HubSpot/Salesforce sync.

Key features: Screen recording, video hosting, AI avatars, per-recipient analytics, CRM integrations, video playlists, video landing pages, sales content hub.

Pricing: Free (25 videos), Pro $29/mo, Teams $59/mo (5+ seats), Business custom.

Best for: Marketing and sales teams that want one platform for both video hosting and outreach, without needing AI personalization at scale.

→ Sendspark vs Vidyard — full comparison

3. Veed.io — Best for Video Editing + Auto-Subtitles

Veed.io is the top Loom alternative for content creators and marketers who need video editing capabilities alongside screen recording. Its auto-subtitle generation is best-in-class — accurate, multi-language, and exportable. At 4.6/5 on G2 with 400+ reviews, it's well-regarded for production quality.

Veed.io lacks the sales-specific features of Sendspark or Vidyard — no CRM sync, no per-recipient analytics, and no video personalization. But if you're creating marketing content, product demos for a website, or training videos, Veed's editing suite is significantly more powerful than Loom's.

Key features: Video editing, auto-subtitles (40+ languages), screen recording, AI background removal, noise removal, teleprompter, brand kit, team collaboration.

Pricing: Free (25 min/video), Basic $18/mo, Pro $30/mo, Business $59/mo (5 seats).

Best for: Content creators, marketers, and teams who need polished, edited video with auto-captions — not outbound sales outreach.

→ Sendspark vs Veed.io — full comparison

4. BombBomb — Best for Relationship-Based Video Email

BombBomb is the leading Loom alternative for relationship-driven industries — particularly real estate, mortgage, and insurance — where personal connection matters more than scale. It integrates natively with Outlook and Gmail, making it the easiest drop-in replacement for teams already living in their email client.

BombBomb's G2 rating of 4.1/5 from 500+ reviews is lower than most competitors on this list, reflecting complaints about its aging UI and limited AI features. However, for a solo insurance agent or a real estate team that wants to add a human face to every email, it remains a practical option.

Key features: Video email, Outlook/Gmail plugin, CRM integrations, video analytics, screen recording, mobile recording, custom video landing pages.

Pricing: Essentials $36/mo, Plus $56/mo, Advanced $70/mo (all single seat, unlimited videos).

Best for: Real estate, mortgage, and insurance sales reps who need to add personal video to email without changing their existing workflow.

→ Sendspark vs BombBomb — full comparison

5. Hippo Video — Best for Interactive Video with Embedded CTAs

Hippo Video stands out from Loom with interactive video capabilities — you can embed quizzes, polls, and CTAs directly inside the video, making it uniquely suited for sales rooms and product demos where you want prospects to take action without leaving the video. Its G2 rating of 4.5/5 from 600+ reviews confirms consistent user satisfaction.

The platform supports multi-language video and has a built-in teleprompter — useful for teams that need to stay on-script during demos. On the downside, it lacks Sendspark's AI personalization layer and its HubSpot integration isn't as highly rated.

Key features: Interactive video (quizzes, CTAs, polls), multi-language support, teleprompter, video analytics, CRM integrations, video personalization, screen recording.

Pricing: Free (limited), Starter $20/mo, Pro $29/mo, Business custom.

Best for: Sales teams that want interactive demos and embedded CTAs in their videos, especially for multi-language markets.

→ Sendspark vs Hippo Video — full comparison

6. ScreenPal — Best Budget Screen Recorder

ScreenPal (formerly Screencast-O-Matic) is the most affordable Loom alternative, with paid plans starting at just $4/month. If your main use case is simple screen recording — tutorials, walkthroughs, onboarding videos — and you don't need sales-specific features, ScreenPal delivers solid value. Its G2 rating of 4.4/5 from 300+ reviews reflects a dependable but basic tool.

ScreenPal's quiz and assessment features make it popular in education and training contexts. It lacks any AI personalization, CRM integration, or sales automation — this is a recording tool, not a sales tool.

Key features: Screen recording, video editing, captions, quiz/assessment tools, video library, cloud hosting, YouTube/LMS integrations.

Pricing: Free (15 min/video), Deluxe $4/mo, Premier $8/mo, Teams $10/user/mo.

Best for: Educators, small businesses, and teams who need affordable screen recording without sales features.

→ Sendspark vs ScreenPal — full comparison

7. Dubb — Best for Video Landing Pages + CTA Overlays

Dubb is the best Loom alternative for teams that want custom video landing pages with overlaid CTAs, lead capture forms, and engagement analytics. Its 4.7/5 G2 rating (100+ reviews) reflects a niche but highly satisfied user base. Dubb's video landing page builder is meaningfully more flexible than Loom's shared video links.

Dubb misses AI personalization, voice cloning, and dynamic backgrounds — all Sendspark strengths. But for a sales rep who wants to send a polished video landing page with a calendar embed and a lead form, Dubb fills the gap.

Key features: Video messaging, video landing pages, call-to-action overlays, CRM integrations, video analytics, screen recording, video library, automation.

Pricing: Free (5 videos), Pro $42/mo, Growth $68/mo (3 seats), Enterprise custom.

Best for: Sales teams focused on high-touch outbound that want polished video landing pages with embedded CTAs and lead capture.

→ Sendspark vs Dubb — full comparison

What Sales Teams Are Saying About Loom Alternatives

G2 reviews from sales teams who've moved away from Loom consistently point to one gap: Loom records video, but doesn't help you send it to prospects at scale. The most common complaint is that Loom videos feel generic when used in cold outreach — recipients can tell the video wasn't recorded for them specifically.

Teams that switch to Sendspark frequently cite the AI personalization layer as the deciding factor. According to G2 reviewers, the ability to show a prospect's own website in the video background — without re-recording — changes how prospects respond. One pattern that emerges: reply rates improve not just because the video is personalized, but because the personalization signals that the sender did their homework.

For async team communication, Loom still wins. Sales practitioners on G2 are clear that Loom is excellent for internal updates, product walkthroughs for teammates, and customer success documentation. The switch to an alternative makes sense primarily when the use case shifts to outbound — cold outreach, follow-ups, and deal progression. For that use case, tools built for sales (Sendspark, Vidyard, BombBomb) consistently outperform Loom in user satisfaction metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Loom alternative for B2B sales teams?

Sendspark is the best Loom alternative for B2B sales teams. Unlike Loom, Sendspark adds AI-powered video personalization — inserting each prospect's name, company, and website into your video automatically. It integrates with HubSpot (5/5 rated), Salesforce, Outreach, and Apollo for a complete sales workflow.

Is there a free Loom alternative?

Yes — Vidyard, Veed.io, Hippo Video, ScreenPal, and Dubb all offer free tiers. Vidyard's free plan allows 25 videos with analytics. ScreenPal's free tier supports recordings up to 15 minutes. For sales teams, Sendspark offers a 7-day free trial with full AI features.

What does Loom not do well for sales outreach?

Loom lacks AI video personalization, CRM bi-directional sync, and sales sequence automation. Every prospect receives the same generic video. Tools like Sendspark personalize the video for each recipient automatically — showing their name, company, and website inside the video without re-recording.

How do Loom alternatives compare on pricing?

ScreenPal starts at $4/mo (budget), Veed.io and Hippo Video at $18-20/mo, BombBomb at $36/mo, Sendspark at $49/mo, and Dubb at $42/mo. Vidyard offers a free tier. Pricing reflects use case: sales-focused tools cost more because they deliver measurable revenue impact.

Which Loom alternative integrates best with HubSpot?

Sendspark has the highest-rated HubSpot integration at 5/5 on G2, with bi-directional sync — video view data flows back into contact records automatically. Vidyard also has a HubSpot integration. Loom's HubSpot integration is limited to manual sharing, with no native CRM sync.

Can I use a Loom alternative for async team communication?

Yes — most alternatives support async communication. Veed.io, Vidyard, and Hippo Video all handle internal video messaging well. For pure async team communication, Loom remains strong. The alternatives on this list primarily serve external use cases: sales outreach, customer onboarding, and marketing videos.

Sources & References

1. G2 — Loom Reviews — Loom rated 4.7/5 from 1,800+ verified user reviews (2026)
2. G2 — Vidyard Reviews — Vidyard rated 4.5/5 from 800+ verified user reviews (2026)
3. Salesforce State of Sales Report — Sales teams cite video as a growing channel for prospect engagement (2025)